Selection tool

Depth, resolution, cost — pick two

No method wins on every axis. Select up to four to compare, or read the scatter below: depth of investigation against resolution, with marker size showing relative cost.

AttributeGPRTEM/TDEMIP/ERT
DomainFrequency domainTime domainGalvanic
SourceImpulse radar antennaSwitched transmitter loopInjected DC / low-frequency current
Frequency band10 MHz - 2.6 GHzEquivalent 1 Hz - 100 kHzDC - 10 Hz
Depth range0.1 - 30 m20 - 1,500 m2 - 500 m
ResolutionVery high (centimetres)Good for conductorsHigh near surface, degrades with depth
Typical costLowModerateLow to moderate
Survey speedFast - walking or vehicle towedModerate - loop layout dominatesSlow - electrodes must be planted
Best terrainDry, resistive ground; concrete; ice; sandOpen ground; loops need clear spaceGround where electrodes can be coupled
SimulatorOpenOpenOpen

Depth vs resolution (marker size = cost)

CSEM: 500 - 4,000 m · GPR: 0.1 - 30 m · AEM: 20 - 400 m · MT/AMT: 50 m - 100 km · GsAMT: 50 - 2,000 m · TEM/TDEM: 20 - 1,500 m · RIM/BHR: 10 - 300 m between holes · IP/ERT: 2 - 500 m